Global EV Comparison: Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €59590. The Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €42999 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-2023 | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Czech Republic | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €59590 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €42999 | €36200 |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) has a larger battery, the Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 409 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 534 km | 539 km |
| Range (GCC) | 454 km | 428 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 82 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 77 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | 18.5 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.9 km/kWh | 5.42 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.7 | 6.9 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 200 kW, while the Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) maxes out at 175 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 175 kW | 200 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), PMSM (rear) | IM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 195 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 261 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 425 Nm | 670 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7 s | 4.8 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Performance Score | 4 | 5.6 |
Dimensions
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) has a longer body, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) stands taller, offering a more elevated ride. Their widths are almost identical, so both offer a similar amount of shoulder room.
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4653 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2148 mm | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1879 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1617 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2765 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…), but the Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor (2022-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x (2023).
| Property | Škoda Enyaq Coupe iV 80x | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Twin Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2214 kg | 2170 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 575 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1700 l | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1200 kg | 1800 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7 | 6.7 |