Global EV Comparison: Škoda Enyaq iV RS vs Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €58197. The Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €44390 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-2023 | 2023-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Czech Republic | Hungary |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (New) | - Price Europe (New) | €58197 |
| Price Europe (Used) | €44390 | €37990 |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 6.2 |
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…).
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 333 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 517 km | 448 km |
| Range (GCC) | 439 km | 351 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 82 kWh | 69.7 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 77 kWh | 66.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | 18.9 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.7 km/kWh | 5.28 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.4 | 5.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 175 kW, while the Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…) maxes out at 100 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 175 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 5.4 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), PMSM (rear) | IM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 220 kW | 215 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 295 hp | 288 hp |
| Motor Torque | 460 Nm | 520 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
| Top Speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Dimensions
The Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.
The Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4653 mm | 4684 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2148 mm | 2020 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1879 mm | 1834 mm |
| Height | 1604 mm | 1667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2768 mm | 2829 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023) provides more trunk space, but both cars have an identical maximum cargo capacity with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC (2023-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq iV RS (2023).
| Property | Škoda Enyaq iV RS | Mercedes EQB 350 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 2258 kg | 2165 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 585 l | 495 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1710 l | 1710 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1200 kg | 1700 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7 | 7.4 |
