USA EV Comparison: Acura ZDX Type S AWD vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) has a starting price of $73500, compared to the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…), which starts at $86290.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Years of Production 2024-… 2024-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture USA USA
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability USA EU, USA
Price USA (New) $73500 $86290
Price USA (Used) $57400 $89999
GCC Score 6.9 7.3

Range and Efficiency

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Range (EPA) 278 mi 310 mi
Range (WLTP) - Range (WLTP) 360 mi
Range (GCC) 264 mi 301 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 106 kWh 111 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 102 kWh 107 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 38.6 kWh/100 mi 35.5 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 2.59 mi/kWh 2.81 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.2 6.6

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Max Charging Power (AC) 11.5 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 190 kW 250 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 1 CCS Type 1
Charging Score 7.5 7.6

Performance

Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.

Although the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) has more power, the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Drive Type AWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) PMSM (front), PMSM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 372 kW 380 kW
Motor Power (hp) 499 hp 510 hp
Motor Torque 544 lb-ft 671 lb-ft
0-60 mph 4.3 s 4.7 s
Top Speed 131 mph 112 mph
Performance Score 6.3 6.3

Dimensions

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Length 197.7 in 198.3 in
Width (with Mirrors) - Width (with Mirrors) 83.2 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 77 in 77.3 in
Height 64.4 in 68.7 in
Wheelbase 121.8 in 117.5 in

Cargo and Towing

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Number of Seats 5 5, 6, 7
Curb Weight 6052 lb 6144 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 29.7 ft3 12.9 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 63 ft3 67.6 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 1.6 ft3
Towing Capacity 3500 lb 4850 lb
Cargo and Towing Score 8 8.7
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared