Global EV Comparison: Acura ZDX Type S AWD vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production. The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) has a starting price of €96800, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) is not sold in Europe.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Years of Production 2024-… 2024-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture USA USA
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability USA EU, USA
Price Europe (New) - Price Europe (New) €96800
Price Europe (Used) - Price Europe (Used) €94900
GCC Score 6.9 7.3

Range and Efficiency

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Range (EPA) 447 km 499 km
Range (WLTP) - Range (WLTP) 580 km
Range (GCC) 425 km 484 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 106 kWh 111 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 102 kWh 107 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 24 kWh/100 km 22.1 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.17 km/kWh 4.52 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.2 6.6

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Max Charging Power (AC) 11.5 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 190 kW 250 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 1 CCS Type 2
Charging Score 7.5 7.5

Performance

Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.

Although the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) has more power, the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Drive Type AWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) PMSM (front), PMSM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 372 kW 380 kW
Motor Power (hp) 499 hp 510 hp
Motor Torque 737 Nm 910 Nm
0-100 km/h 4.5 s 4.9 s
Top Speed 211 km/h 180 km/h
Performance Score 6.3 6.3

Dimensions

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Length 5022 mm 5037 mm
Width (with Mirrors) - Width (with Mirrors) 2113 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1955 mm 1964 mm
Height 1637 mm 1744 mm
Wheelbase 3094 mm 2985 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Acura ZDX Type S AWD Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance
Number of Seats 5 5, 6, 7
Curb Weight 2745 kg 2787 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 840 l 365 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1785 l 1915 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 37 l
Towing Capacity 1587 kg 2200 kg
Cargo and Towing Score 8 8.7
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared