Global EV Comparison: Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance vs Acura ZDX Type S AWD

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production. The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) has a starting price of €96800, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) is not sold in Europe.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Years of Production 2024-… 2024-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture USA USA
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU, USA USA
Price Europe (New) €96800 - Price Europe (New)
Price Europe (Used) €94900 - Price Europe (Used)
GCC Score 7.3 6.9

Range and Efficiency

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Range (EPA) 499 km 447 km
Range (WLTP) 580 km - Range (WLTP)
Range (GCC) 484 km 425 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 111 kWh 106 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 107 kWh 102 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 22.1 kWh/100 km 24 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.52 km/kWh 4.17 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 6.6 5.2

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 250 kW, while the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) maxes out at 190 kW.

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11.5 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 250 kW 190 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 CCS Type 1
Charging Score 7.6 7.5

Performance

Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.

Although the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) has more power, the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-100 km/h time.

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Drive Type AWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) PMSM (front), PMSM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 380 kW 372 kW
Motor Power (hp) 510 hp 499 hp
Motor Torque 910 Nm 737 Nm
0-100 km/h 4.9 s 4.5 s
Top Speed 180 km/h 211 km/h
Performance Score 6.3 6.3

Dimensions

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Length 5037 mm 5022 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2113 mm - Width (with Mirrors)
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1964 mm 1955 mm
Height 1744 mm 1637 mm
Wheelbase 2985 mm 3094 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…), but the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Acura ZDX Type S AWD (2024-…).

Property Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Performance Acura ZDX Type S AWD
Number of Seats 5, 6, 7 5
Curb Weight 2787 kg 2745 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 365 l 840 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1915 l 1785 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 37 l - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity 2200 kg 1587 kg
Cargo and Towing Score 8.7 8
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared