USA EV Comparison: Audi Q4 e-tron 40 vs Rimac Nevera C_Two
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of . The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as $21158 on the used car market.
The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is a SUV, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is a Roadster.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-2024 | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Croatia |
| Body Style | SUV | Roadster |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | USA |
| Price USA (Used) | $21158 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.2 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024).
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 265 mi | 305 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 325 mi | 304 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 259 mi | 274 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 82 kWh | 120 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 76.6 kWh | 114 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 29.6 kWh/100 mi | 41.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.38 mi/kWh | 2.4 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.9 | 4.9 |
Charging
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features an advanced 730-volt architecture, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 500 kW, while the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) maxes out at 143 kW.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 143 kW | 500 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 730 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.4 | 10 |
Performance
The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 150 kW | 1427 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 201 hp | 1914 hp |
| Motor Torque | 229 lb-ft | 1726 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9 s | 1.7 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 256 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.3 | 8.9 |
Dimensions
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 180.6 in | 186.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 83 in | 80.8 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 73.4 in | - Width (w/o Mirrors) |
| Height | 64.3 in | 48.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 108.8 in | 108.1 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) has a towing capacity of up to 2200 lb, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Curb Weight | 4519 lb | 5070 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 18.4 ft3 | 3.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 52.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 2200 lb | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.7 | 3.3 |
