USA EV Comparison: BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah vs Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) for as low as $4500, while the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) begins at $13794.
The BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is a Hatchback, whereas the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is a Sedan.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2013-2017 | 2018-2020 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany | USA |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | USA |
| Price USA (Used) | $4500 | $13794 |
| GCC Score | 4.9 | 6 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017).
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 81 mi | 264 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 284 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 83 mi | 246 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 21.6 kWh | 65 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 18.8 kWh | 62 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 22.7 kWh/100 mi | 25.2 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.41 mi/kWh | 3.97 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.8 | 7.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 200 kW, while the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) maxes out at 50 kW.
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 7.7 kW, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.4 kW | 7.7 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 200 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | Tesla (NACS) |
| Charging Score | 3.8 | 5.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are rear-wheel drive.
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 202 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 271 hp |
| Motor Torque | 184 lb-ft | 298 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7 s | 5.2 s |
| Top Speed | 93 mph | 140 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.2 | 5 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is longer and wider, but the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is taller.
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 157.4 in | 184.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 80.3 in | 82.2 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 69.9 in | 72.8 in |
| Height | 62.1 in | 56.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.2 in | 113.2 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020), but the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah | Tesla Model 3 Mid Range |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2866 lb | 3686 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 9.2 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 38.8 ft3 | 43.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 3.1 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.2 | 5.1 |
