USA EV Comparison: Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) vs Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) has a starting price of $120000, compared to the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…), which starts at $147550.

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is a Liftback, whereas the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) is a Sedan.

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Years of Production 2024-… 2024-…
Current Status Produced Produced
Country of Manufacture China Germany, India
Body Style Liftback Sedan
Market Availability EU, USA EU, USA
Price USA (New) $120000 $147550
Price USA (Used) - Price USA (Used) $90295
GCC Score 6.9 7.1

Range and Efficiency

The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...).

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Range (EPA) - Range (EPA) 315 mi
Range (WLTP) 301 mi 389 mi
Range (GCC) 250 mi 309 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 102 kWh 125 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 100 kWh 118 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 40 kWh/100 mi 38.2 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 2.5 mi/kWh 2.62 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 4.8 6.3

Charging

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features an advanced 800-volt architecture, whereas the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) relies on a standard 400-volt system.

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 350 kW, while the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) maxes out at 200 kW.

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) is limited to 19.2 kW.

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Max Charging Power (AC) 22 kW 19.2 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 350 kW 200 kW
Architecture 800 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 1 CCS Type 1
Charging Score 10 8.6

Performance

Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Drive Type AWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) PMSM (front), PMSM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 675 kW 560 kW
Motor Power (hp) 905 hp 751 hp
Motor Torque 726 lb-ft 752 lb-ft
0-60 mph 2.7 s 3.3 s
Top Speed 159 mph 155 mph
Performance Score 7.9 7.7

Dimensions

The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.

The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Length 202.3 in 205.6 in
Width (with Mirrors) 88.2 in 83.7 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 78.9 in 75.8 in
Height 57.6 in 59.8 in
Wheelbase 120.8 in 126.4 in

Cargo and Towing

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) doesn’t have one.

Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.

Property Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 5842 lb 5864 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 18 ft3 21.9 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) - Cargo Volume (Max) 60 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 1.6 ft3 - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity
Cargo and Towing Score 5.5 6.4
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared