USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model X P90D
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) for as low as $18500, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2023 | 2016-2016 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Netherlands, USA |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $18500 |
| GCC Score | 6.3 | 7.1 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 250 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 268 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 226 mi | 227 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 85 kWh | 90 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 80 kWh | 85.5 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi | 37.7 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.83 mi/kWh | 2.65 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.1 | 4.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11.5 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 11.5 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 112 kW | 120 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Tesla (NACS) |
| Charging Score | 5.8 | 6.5 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), IM (rear) | PMSM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 345 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 463 hp |
| Motor Torque | 561 lb-ft | 713 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9 s | 3.8 s |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 155 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.7 | 7 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 187.5 in | 198.9 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.5 in | 89.4 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 74.2 in | 78.7 in |
| Height | 63.9 in | 66.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.1 in | 116.7 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) features a larger trunk, but the Tesla Model X P90D (2016) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model X P90D (2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
The Tesla Model X P90D (2016) has a towing capacity of up to 5000 lb, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | Tesla Model X P90D |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5, 6, 7 |
| Curb Weight | 5500 lb | 5381 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 17.7 ft3 | 12.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 51.6 ft3 | 85.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 6.6 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 5000 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7 | 8.9 |
