Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

While the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Years of Production 2024-… 2022-2022
Current Status Produced Discontinued
Country of Manufacture France Belgium
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU EU
GCC Score 7 6.1

Range and Efficiency

The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Range (WLTP) 435 mi 264 mi
Range (GCC) 370 mi 227 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 101 kWh 69 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 96.9 kWh 67 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 26.2 kWh/100 mi 29.5 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 3.82 mi/kWh 3.39 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 9.5 6.3

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) maxes out at 150 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 160 kW 150 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 CCS Type 2
Charging Score 6.9 6.2

Performance

Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.

Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Drive Type FWD FWD
Motor Type 1 motor: PMSM 1 motor: PMSM
Motor Power (kW) 170 kW 170 kW
Motor Power (hp) 228 hp 228 hp
Motor Torque 253 lb-ft 243 lb-ft
0-60 mph 8.6 s 7.1 s
Top Speed 106 mph 99 mph
Performance Score 3.6 3.6

Dimensions

The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).

Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Length 178.7 in 174.2 in
Width (with Mirrors) 74.6 in 80.1 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 74.4 in 73.7 in
Height 64.6 in 65 in
Wheelbase 107.8 in 106.4 in

Cargo and Towing

The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) features a larger trunk, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has a towing capacity of up to 2000 lb, whereas the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.

Property Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 4960 lb 4475 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 18.4 ft3 16 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 52.3 ft3 57.5 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 1.1 ft3
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity 2000 lb
Cargo and Towing Score 6.4 6.8
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared