USA EV Comparison: Škoda Citigo-e iV vs Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles have been discontinued and were never available for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Hatchback.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2021 | 2012-2016 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Slovakia | France |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 4.4 | 5 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016).
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 160 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 135 mi | 98 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 36.8 kWh | 25.9 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 32.3 kWh | 23.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 23.9 kWh/100 mi | 23.8 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.18 mi/kWh | 4.21 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.9 | 5.6 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) has no DC fast charging capability, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) can charge at up to 40 kW.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 43 kW, whereas the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 43 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 40 kW | - Max Charging Power (DC) |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | Type 2 (Mennekes) |
| Charging Score | 3.9 | 5.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) has more power, the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 61 kW | 65 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 82 hp | 87 hp |
| Motor Torque | 156 lb-ft | 162 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 11.8 s | 13 s |
| Top Speed | 81 mph | 84 mph |
| Performance Score | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Dimensions
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 141.6 in | 160.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 76.6 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 64.8 in | 68.1 in |
| Height | 58.3 in | 61.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 95.4 in | 101.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Škoda Citigo-e iV | Renault Zoe Z.E. Q210 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2723 lb | 3236 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 8.8 ft3 | 11.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 32.6 ft3 | 43.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 3.6 | 4.2 |
