Tesla Model S 85 vs Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) for as low as $9500, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is a Liftback, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV.
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2012-2016 | 2019-2023 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Netherlands, USA | Germany, China |
| Body Style | Liftback | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price USA (Used) | $9500 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Range and Efficiency
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 265 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 268 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 243 mi | 226 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 85 kWh | 85 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 80.8 kWh | 80 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 33.3 kWh/100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.01 mi/kWh | 2.83 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.9 | 5.1 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 10 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 10 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 120 kW | 112 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | Tesla (NACS) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.1 | 5.9 |
Performance
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM | IM (front), IM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 278 kW | 300 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 373 hp | 402 hp |
| Motor Torque | 325 lb-ft | 561 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4 s | 4.9 s |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | 112 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.4 | 5.7 |
Dimensions
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 195.7 in | 187.5 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 86.2 in | 82.5 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 77.3 in | 74.2 in |
| Height | 56.9 in | 63.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 116.5 in | 113.1 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Tesla Model S 85 | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5, 7 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4630 lb | 5500 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 26.3 ft3 | 17.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 58.1 ft3 | 51.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 2.1 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.5 | 7 |
