Tesla Model S 85 vs Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) for as low as €15950, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) begins at €32890.

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is a Liftback, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV.

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Years of Production 2012-2016 2019-2023
Current Status Discontinued Discontinued
Country of Manufacture Netherlands, USA Germany, China
Body Style Liftback SUV
Market Availability EU, USA EU
Price Europe (Used) €15950 €32890
GCC Score 6.3 6.3

Range and Efficiency

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Range (EPA) 426 km - Range (EPA)
Range (WLTP) - Range (WLTP) 432 km
Range (GCC) 391 km 364 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 85 kWh 85 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 80.8 kWh 80 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 20.7 kWh/100 km 22 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.84 km/kWh 4.55 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.9 5.1

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 120 kW 112 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes) CCS Type 2
Charging Score 6.1 5.9

Performance

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Drive Type RWD AWD
Motor Type IM IM (front), IM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 278 kW 300 kW
Motor Power (hp) 373 hp 402 hp
Motor Torque 440 Nm 760 Nm
0-100 km/h 5.6 s 5.1 s
Top Speed 225 km/h 180 km/h
Performance Score 5.4 5.7

Dimensions

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Length 4970 mm 4762 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2189 mm 2096 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1964 mm 1884 mm
Height 1445 mm 1624 mm
Wheelbase 2960 mm 2873 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a towing capacity of up to 1800 kg, whereas the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.

Property Tesla Model S 85 Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Number of Seats 5, 7 5
Curb Weight 2100 kg 2495 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 745 l 500 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1645 l 1460 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 60 l - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity 1800 kg
Cargo and Towing Score 5.5 7
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared