Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model S 85

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) for as low as €32890, while the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) begins at €15950.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is a Liftback.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Years of Production 2019-2023 2012-2016
Current Status Discontinued Discontinued
Country of Manufacture Germany, China Netherlands, USA
Body Style SUV Liftback
Market Availability EU EU, USA
Price Europe (Used) €32890 €15950
GCC Score 6.3 6.3

Range and Efficiency

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023).

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Range (EPA) - Range (EPA) 426 km
Range (WLTP) 432 km - Range (WLTP)
Range (GCC) 364 km 391 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 85 kWh 85 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 80 kWh 80.8 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 22 kWh/100 km 20.7 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.55 km/kWh 4.84 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.1 5.9

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 120 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 112 kW 120 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 Tesla Type 2 (Mennekes)
Charging Score 5.9 6.1

Performance

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Drive Type AWD RWD
Motor Type IM (front), IM (rear) IM
Motor Power (kW) 300 kW 278 kW
Motor Power (hp) 402 hp 373 hp
Motor Torque 760 Nm 440 Nm
0-100 km/h 5.1 s 5.6 s
Top Speed 180 km/h 225 km/h
Performance Score 5.7 5.4

Dimensions

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller.

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Length 4762 mm 4970 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2096 mm 2189 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1884 mm 1964 mm
Height 1624 mm 1445 mm
Wheelbase 2873 mm 2960 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a towing capacity of up to 1800 kg, whereas the Tesla Model S 85 (2012-2016) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model S 85
Number of Seats 5 5, 7
Curb Weight 2495 kg 2100 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 500 l 745 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1460 l 1645 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 60 l
Towing Capacity 1800 kg - Towing Capacity
Cargo and Towing Score 7 5.5
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared