Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric vs Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Years of Production 2022-2022 2025-…
Current Status Discontinued Announced
Country of Manufacture Belgium Japan, China
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU EU, USA
GCC Score 6.1 6.6

Range and Efficiency

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Range (WLTP) 264 mi 373 mi
Range (GCC) 227 mi 317 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 69 kWh 77 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 67 kWh 69.3 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 29.5 kWh/100 mi 21.9 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 3.39 mi/kWh 4.57 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 6.3 9.7

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 150 kW 150 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 Tesla (NACS)
Charging Score 6.2 6.4

Performance

Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.

Both cars deliver the same 0-60 mph acceleration time, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power.

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Drive Type FWD FWD
Motor Type 1 motor: PMSM 1 motor: PMSM
Motor Power (kW) 170 kW 165 kW
Motor Power (hp) 228 hp 221 hp
Motor Torque 243 lb-ft 139 lb-ft
0-60 mph 7.1 s 7.1 s
Top Speed 99 mph 99 mph
Performance Score 3.6 3.3

Dimensions

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a longer body, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) stands taller, offering a more elevated ride. Their widths are almost identical, so both offer a similar amount of shoulder room.

Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Length 174.2 in 178 in
Width (with Mirrors) 80.1 in - Width (with Mirrors)
Width (w/o Mirrors) 73.7 in 73.6 in
Height 65 in 62.8 in
Wheelbase 106.4 in 108.3 in

Cargo and Towing

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has a towing capacity of up to 2000 lb, whereas the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.

Property Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 4475 lb - Curb Weight
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 16 ft3 14.7 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) 57.5 ft3 - Cargo Volume (Max)
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 1.1 ft3 - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity 2000 lb - Towing Capacity
Cargo and Towing Score 6.8 6.3
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared