Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in imperial units (mi, lb). To see metric units (km, kg), switch website version to Global.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is announced, but not yet in production. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Years of Production 2025-… 2022-2022
Current Status Announced Discontinued
Country of Manufacture Japan, China Belgium
Body Style SUV SUV
Market Availability EU, USA EU
GCC Score 6.6 6.1

Range and Efficiency

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Range (WLTP) 373 mi 264 mi
Range (GCC) 317 mi 227 mi
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 77 kWh 69 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 69.3 kWh 67 kWh
Efficiency per 100 mi 21.9 kWh/100 mi 29.5 kWh/100 mi
Efficiency per kWh 4.57 mi/kWh 3.39 mi/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 9.7 6.3

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 150 kW 150 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port Tesla (NACS) CCS Type 2
Charging Score 6.4 6.2

Performance

Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.

Both cars deliver the same 0-60 mph acceleration time, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power.

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Drive Type FWD FWD
Motor Type 1 motor: PMSM 1 motor: PMSM
Motor Power (kW) 165 kW 170 kW
Motor Power (hp) 221 hp 228 hp
Motor Torque 139 lb-ft 243 lb-ft
0-60 mph 7.1 s 7.1 s
Top Speed 99 mph 99 mph
Performance Score 3.3 3.6

Dimensions

The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a longer body, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) stands taller, offering a more elevated ride. Their widths are almost identical, so both offer a similar amount of shoulder room.

Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Length 178 in 174.2 in
Width (with Mirrors) - Width (with Mirrors) 80.1 in
Width (w/o Mirrors) 73.6 in 73.7 in
Height 62.8 in 65 in
Wheelbase 108.3 in 106.4 in

Cargo and Towing

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.

The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has a towing capacity of up to 2000 lb, whereas the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.

Property Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight - Curb Weight 4475 lb
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 14.7 ft3 16 ft3
Cargo Volume (Max) - Cargo Volume (Max) 57.5 ft3
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 1.1 ft3
Towing Capacity - Towing Capacity 2000 lb
Cargo and Towing Score 6.3 6.8
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared