Global EV Comparison: Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Although the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has been announced, it is not yet in production and will not be available for sale in Europe. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €30890 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Announced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan, China | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €30890 |
| GCC Score | 6.6 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 600 km | 425 km |
| Range (GCC) | 510 km | 366 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 77 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 69.3 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 13.6 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 7.36 km/kWh | 5.46 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.7 | 6.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
Both vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.4 | 6.2 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 165 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 221 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 300 Nm | 330 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) has a longer body, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) stands taller, offering a more elevated ride. Their widths are almost identical, so both offer a similar amount of shoulder room.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4520 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | - Width (with Mirrors) | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1870 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1595 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD (2025-…).
| Property | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | - Curb Weight | 2030 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 416 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 6.7 |
