USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) for as low as $4500, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is a Hatchback.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2019-2023 | 2013-2017 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Germany |
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU, USA |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $4500 |
| GCC Score | 6.3 | 4.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017).
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 81 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 268 mi | - Range (WLTP) |
| Range (GCC) | 226 mi | 83 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 85 kWh | 21.6 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 80 kWh | 18.8 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 35.4 kWh/100 mi | 22.7 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.83 mi/kWh | 4.41 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 5.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 112 kW, while the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) maxes out at 50 kW.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 9.6 kW, whereas the BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 7.4 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 112 kW | 50 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 5.8 | 3.8 |
Performance
The BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah (2013-2017) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | IM (front), IM (rear) | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 300 kW | 125 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 402 hp | 168 hp |
| Motor Torque | 561 lb-ft | 184 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9 s | 7 s |
| Top Speed | 112 mph | 93 mph |
| Performance Score | 5.7 | 3.2 |
Dimensions
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 187.5 in | 157.4 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.5 in | 80.3 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 74.2 in | 69.9 in |
| Height | 63.9 in | 62.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 113.1 in | 101.2 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC | BMW i3 BEV 60 Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Curb Weight | 5500 lb | 2866 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 17.7 ft3 | 9.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 51.6 ft3 | 38.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.9 | 4.2 |
