USA EV Comparison: Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 vs Škoda Citigo-e iV
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles have been discontinued and were never available for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Hatchback.
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2010-2020 | 2019-2021 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Japan | Slovakia |
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020).
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 62 mi | 160 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 62 mi | 135 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 16 kWh | 36.8 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 14.5 kWh | 32.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 23.4 kWh/100 mi | 23.9 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.28 mi/kWh | 4.18 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.4 | 5.9 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 50 kW, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) maxes out at 40 kW.
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 7.2 kW, whereas the Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020) is limited to 3.7 kW.
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 3.7 kW | 7.2 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 50 kW | 40 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CHAdeMO Type 1 (J1772) | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 3 | 3.9 |
Performance
The Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020) is rear-wheel drive, while the Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) offers a front-wheel drive system.
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 49 kW | 61 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 66 hp | 82 hp |
| Motor Torque | 145 lb-ft | 156 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 15.3 s | 11.8 s |
| Top Speed | 81 mph | 81 mph |
| Performance Score | 1.4 | 1.7 |
Dimensions
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) is longer and wider, but the Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020) is taller.
The Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 (2010-2020) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 136.8 in | 141.6 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 70.6 in | - Width (with Mirrors) |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 58.1 in | 64.8 in |
| Height | 63 in | 58.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 100.4 in | 95.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Škoda Citigo-e iV (2019-2021) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Citroën C-Zero Gen 1 | Škoda Citigo-e iV |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Curb Weight | 2469 lb | 2723 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 5.9 ft3 | 8.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 30.4 ft3 | 32.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 4.1 | 3.6 |
