USA EV Comparison: Ford Puma Gen-E FWD vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Romania | India |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 6 | 5.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 234 mi | 265 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 201 mi | 225 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 46 kWh | 61.1 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 43 kWh | 59.8 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.4 kWh/100 mi | 26.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.67 mi/kWh | 3.76 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.3 | 6.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) maxes out at 55 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 100 kW | 55 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.3 | 5.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) has more power, the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 124 kW | 128 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 166 hp | 172 hp |
| Motor Torque | 214 lb-ft | 142 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 85 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.3 | 2.9 |
Dimensions
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 165.9 in | 168.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 76 in | 81.3 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 71.1 in | 70.9 in |
| Height | 61.2 in | 64.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 101.9 in | 106.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…), but the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
| Property | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 3446 lb | 4045 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 18.5 ft3 | 8.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 45.3 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.5 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1653 lb | 1654 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.9 | 6.2 |
