USA EV Comparison: Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD vs Ford Puma Gen-E FWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2025-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | India | Romania |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 5.9 | 6 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 265 mi | 234 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 225 mi | 201 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 61.1 kWh | 46 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 59.8 kWh | 43 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26.6 kWh/100 mi | 21.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.76 mi/kWh | 4.67 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.7 | 7.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) maxes out at 55 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 55 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.6 | 5.3 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) has more power, the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 128 kW | 124 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 172 hp | 166 hp |
| Motor Torque | 142 lb-ft | 214 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4 s | 7.7 s |
| Top Speed | 85 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 2.9 | 3.3 |
Dimensions
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 168.7 in | 165.9 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 81.3 in | 76 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 70.9 in | 71.1 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 61.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 101.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…), but the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) doesn’t have one.
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Ford Puma Gen-E FWD (2024-…).
| Property | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD | Ford Puma Gen-E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4045 lb | 3446 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 8.4 ft3 | 18.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 19.8 ft3 | 45.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.5 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | 1654 lb | 1653 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.2 | 5.9 |
