USA EV Comparison: Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) vs Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) has a starting price of $120000, compared to the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…), which starts at $106900.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is a Liftback, whereas the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is a Sedan.
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | China | Germany, China |
| Body Style | Liftback | Sedan |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | $120000 | $106900 |
| Price USA (Used) | - Price USA (Used) | $50000 |
| GCC Score | 6.9 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…).
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 230 mi |
| Range (WLTP) | 301 mi | 313 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 250 mi | 242 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 102 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 100 kWh | 90.6 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 40 kWh/100 mi | 37.4 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.5 mi/kWh | 2.67 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.6 | 5 |
Charging
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features an advanced 800-volt architecture, whereas the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 350 kW, while the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) maxes out at 170 kW.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 350 kW | 170 kW |
| Architecture | 800 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 9.9 | 6.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 675 kW | 460 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 905 hp | 617 hp |
| Motor Torque | 726 lb-ft | 701 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7 s | 3.2 s |
| Top Speed | 159 mph | 137 mph |
| Performance Score | 7.9 | 7.2 |
Dimensions
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is taller.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 202.3 in | 195.4 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 88.2 in | 82.8 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 78.9 in | 75 in |
| Height | 57.6 in | 58.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 120.8 in | 122.8 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 5842 lb | 5534 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 18 ft3 | 15.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 31.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.5 | 5.6 |
