USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ vs Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon)
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) has a starting price of $106900, compared to the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), which starts at $120000.
The Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is a Sedan, whereas the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | China |
| Body Style | Sedan | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | $106900 | $120000 |
| Price USA (Used) | $50000 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 6.1 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 230 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | 313 mi | 301 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 242 mi | 250 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 100 kWh | 102 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 90.6 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 37.4 kWh/100 mi | 40 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.67 mi/kWh | 2.5 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 4.6 |
Charging
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features an advanced 800-volt architecture, whereas the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 350 kW, while the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) maxes out at 170 kW.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is limited to 9.6 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 9.6 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 170 kW | 350 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 800 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 6.6 | 9.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 460 kW | 675 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 617 hp | 905 hp |
| Motor Torque | 701 lb-ft | 726 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2 s | 2.7 s |
| Top Speed | 137 mph | 159 mph |
| Performance Score | 7.2 | 7.9 |
Dimensions
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is longer and wider, but the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) is taller.
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 195.4 in | 202.3 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 82.8 in | 88.2 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 75 in | 78.9 in |
| Height | 58.9 in | 57.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 122.8 in | 120.8 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2022-…) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQE AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 5534 lb | 5842 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 15.2 ft3 | 18 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 31.6 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.6 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.6 | 5.5 |
