USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQT Standard vs Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2023-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | France | France, Turkey, UK |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 5.9 | 5.2 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) has a larger battery, the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 175 mi | 139 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 152 mi | 119 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 48 kWh | 50 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 45 kWh | 46.3 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 29.6 kWh/100 mi | 38.9 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.38 mi/kWh | 2.57 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5 | 2.8 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 101 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 80 kW | 101 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 5.4 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Although the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) has more power, the Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 90 kW | 100 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 121 hp | 134 hp |
| Motor Torque | 181 lb-ft | 162 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 12.1 s | 12.8 s |
| Top Speed | 82 mph | 81 mph |
| Performance Score | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Dimensions
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 177.1 in | 196.2 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 85 in | 86.8 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 73.2 in | 75.6 in |
| Height | 71.6 in | 74.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.9 in | 128.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Standard (2023-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh (2024-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Standard | Citroën e-SpaceTourer M 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 9 |
| Curb Weight | 4131 lb | 4469 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 19.5 ft3 | 21.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 69.9 ft3 | 140.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 3307 lb | 2204 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.5 | 8.9 |
