USA EV Comparison: Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD vs Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in the United States. The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) has been discontinued, it was never offered for sale in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2021-2022 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | France | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 6.9 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022).
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 435 mi | 272 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 370 mi | 232 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 101 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 96.9 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 26.2 kWh/100 mi | 28.9 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.82 mi/kWh | 3.46 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 9.4 | 6.4 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) maxes out at 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 160 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.9 | 6.1 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars offer the same motor power, but the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) achieves a faster 0-60 mph time.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 170 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 228 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 253 lb-ft | 243 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6 s | 7.1 s |
| Top Speed | 106 mph | 99 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 178.7 in | 174.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 74.6 in | 80.1 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 74.4 in | 73.7 in |
| Height | 64.6 in | 62.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 107.8 in | 106.4 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022), but the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric (2021-2022) has a towing capacity of up to 2000 lb, whereas the Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is not officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 98 kWh FWD | Volvo C40 Recharge (EC40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 4960 lb | 4343 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 18.4 ft3 | 15 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 52.3 ft3 | 49 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.1 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 2000 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 6.4 |