USA EV Comparison: Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh FWD vs Škoda Enyaq 85

While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

While the Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) maxes out at 135 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

The Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) is rear-wheel drive, while the Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers a front-wheel drive system.

The Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).