USA EV Comparison: Škoda Enyaq 85 vs Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh FWD

While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.

The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.

While the Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) maxes out at 135 kW.

Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.

The Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) is rear-wheel drive, while the Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) offers a front-wheel drive system.

The Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is longer and taller, but about the same width as the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.

Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).

The Peugeot e-5008 98 kWh Long Range FWD (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Škoda Enyaq 85 (2025-…).