Global EV Comparison: Audi Q4 e-tron 35 vs Rimac Nevera C_Two
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in Europe. The Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €24480 on the used car market.
The Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is a Roadster.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2021-2023 | 2022-… |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, China | Croatia |
| Body Style | SUV | Roadster |
| Market Availability | EU | USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | €24480 | - Price Europe (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5.3 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023).
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | - Range (EPA) | 491 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 353 km | 490 km |
| Range (GCC) | 288 km | 441 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 55 kWh | 120 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 52 kWh | 114 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 25.9 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.54 km/kWh | 3.87 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 5.4 | 4.9 |
Charging
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features an advanced 730-volt architecture, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 500 kW, while the Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) maxes out at 118 kW.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) is limited to 7.2 kW.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 7.2 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 118 kW | 500 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 730 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 4.3 | 10 |
Performance
The Audi Q4 e-tron 35 (2021-2023) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 125 kW | 1427 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 168 hp | 1914 hp |
| Motor Torque | 310 Nm | 2340 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 9 s | 1.8 s |
| Top Speed | 160 km/h | 412 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.1 | 8.9 |
Dimensions
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4588 mm | 4745 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2108 mm | 2052 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1865 mm | - Width (w/o Mirrors) |
| Height | 1632 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2745 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in in the EU.
| Property | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 | Rimac Nevera C_Two |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 2 |
| Curb Weight | 1965 kg | 2300 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 520 l | 100 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1490 l | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.3 | 3.3 |
