Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC vs Tesla Model 3 Mid Range

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) for as low as €32890, while the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) was never offered for sale in Europe.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV, whereas the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is a Sedan.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Years of Production 2019-2023 2018-2020
Current Status Discontinued Discontinued
Country of Manufacture Germany, China USA
Body Style SUV Sedan
Market Availability EU USA
Price Europe (Used) €32890 - Price Europe (Used)
GCC Score 6.3 6

Range and Efficiency

Even though the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a larger battery, the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Range (EPA) - Range (EPA) 425 km
Range (WLTP) 432 km 457 km
Range (GCC) 364 km 396 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 85 kWh 65 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 80 kWh 62 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 22 kWh/100 km 15.7 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 4.55 km/kWh 6.39 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 5.1 7.5

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 200 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is limited to 7.7 kW.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Max Charging Power (AC) 11 kW 7.7 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 112 kW 200 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port CCS Type 2 Tesla (NACS)
Charging Score 5.8 5.6

Performance

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Drive Type AWD RWD
Motor Type IM (front), IM (rear) PMSM
Motor Power (kW) 300 kW 202 kW
Motor Power (hp) 402 hp 271 hp
Motor Torque 760 Nm 404 Nm
0-100 km/h 5.1 s 5.5 s
Top Speed 180 km/h 225 km/h
Performance Score 5.7 5

Dimensions

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020).

Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Length 4762 mm 4695 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2096 mm 2088 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1884 mm 1850 mm
Height 1624 mm 1445 mm
Wheelbase 2873 mm 2875 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) features a larger trunk, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020).

Property Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC Tesla Model 3 Mid Range
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 2495 kg 1672 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 500 l 561 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1460 l 1235 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) - Cargo Volume (Frunk) 88 l
Towing Capacity 1800 kg 910 kg
Cargo and Towing Score 7 5.1
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared