Global EV Comparison: Tesla Model 3 Mid Range vs Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC

Side-by-side comparison of all specifications in metric units (km, kg). To see imperial units (mi, lb), switch website version to USA.
Share:

Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!

Instantly compare key specs and get tailored insights to find your ideal EV.
Just a sec! AI is comparing every detail for you...

Your AI Summary Is Ready!

General Info

Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) for as low as €32890, while the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) was never offered for sale in Europe.

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is a Sedan, whereas the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is a SUV.

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Years of Production 2018-2020 2019-2023
Current Status Discontinued Discontinued
Country of Manufacture USA Germany, China
Body Style Sedan SUV
Market Availability USA EU
Price Europe (Used) - Price Europe (Used) €32890
GCC Score 6 6.3

Range and Efficiency

Even though the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) has a larger battery, the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Range (EPA) 425 km - Range (EPA)
Range (WLTP) 457 km 432 km
Range (GCC) 396 km 364 km
Battery Capacity (Nominal) 65 kWh 85 kWh
Battery Capacity (Usable) 62 kWh 80 kWh
Efficiency per 100 km 15.7 kWh/100 km 22 kWh/100 km
Efficiency per kWh 6.39 km/kWh 4.55 km/kWh
Range and Efficiency Score 7.5 5.1

Charging

Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 200 kW, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) maxes out at 112 kW.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW, whereas the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is limited to 7.7 kW.

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Max Charging Power (AC) 7.7 kW 11 kW
Max Charging Power (DC) 200 kW 112 kW
Architecture 400 V 400 V
Charge Port Tesla (NACS) CCS Type 2
Charging Score 5.6 5.8

Performance

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) is rear-wheel drive, while the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers an all-wheel drive system.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Drive Type RWD AWD
Motor Type PMSM IM (front), IM (rear)
Motor Power (kW) 202 kW 300 kW
Motor Power (hp) 271 hp 402 hp
Motor Torque 404 Nm 760 Nm
0-100 km/h 5.5 s 5.1 s
Top Speed 225 km/h 180 km/h
Performance Score 5 5.7

Dimensions

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is taller, but has a similar length and width to the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020).

Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Length 4695 mm 4762 mm
Width (with Mirrors) 2088 mm 2096 mm
Width (w/o Mirrors) 1850 mm 1884 mm
Height 1445 mm 1624 mm
Wheelbase 2875 mm 2873 mm

Cargo and Towing

The Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020) features a larger trunk, but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) offers greater maximum cargo capacity when the rear seats are folded.

A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020), but the Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) doesn’t have one.

The Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (2019-2023) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Tesla Model 3 Mid Range (2018-2020).

Property Tesla Model 3 Mid Range Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC
Number of Seats 5 5
Curb Weight 1672 kg 2495 kg
Cargo Volume (Trunk) 561 l 500 l
Cargo Volume (Max) 1235 l 1460 l
Cargo Volume (Frunk) 88 l - Cargo Volume (Frunk)
Towing Capacity 910 kg 1800 kg
Cargo and Towing Score 5.1 7
Comparison list
2 cars
Let's Compare
Comparison list cleared