Global EV Comparison: Mercedes EQT Long vs Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €41613. The Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €28900 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: Minivan.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2020-2024 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | France | France, Turkey, UK |
| Body Style | Minivan | Minivan |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €41613 | - Price Europe (New) |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €28900 |
| GCC Score | 5.6 | 5.2 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 266 km | 327 km |
| Range (GCC) | 227 km | 282 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 48 kWh | 75 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 45 kWh | 68 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 19.8 kWh/100 km | 24.1 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.04 km/kWh | 4.15 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.4 | 3.5 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 100 kW, while the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) maxes out at 80 kW.
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) is limited to 7.4 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 7.4 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 80 kW | 100 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.7 | 4.8 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
Both cars deliver the same 0-100 km/h acceleration time, but the Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) boasts greater motor power.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 90 kW | 100 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 121 hp | 134 hp |
| Motor Torque | 245 Nm | 260 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
| Top Speed | 132 km/h | 130 km/h |
| Performance Score | 1.8 | 1.9 |
Dimensions
The Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) is wider and taller, but about the same length as the Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…).
The Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4922 mm | 4956 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2159 mm | 2204 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1859 mm | 1920 mm |
| Height | 1811 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3100 mm | 3275 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Mercedes EQT 200 Long (2024-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh (2020-2024).
| Property | Mercedes EQT Long | Citroën e-Jumpy Combi M 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 7 | 9 |
| Curb Weight | 1944 kg | 2131 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 828 l | 507 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 3061 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 1000 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 7.6 | 8.7 |
