Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD vs Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
The Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) is currently produced, it has a starting price of €48650. The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €34990 on the used car market.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2022-2022 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | France | Belgium |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| Price Europe (New) | €48650 | - Price Europe (New) |
| Price Europe (Used) | €45449 | €34990 |
| GCC Score | 6.4 | 6.1 |
Range and Efficiency
The Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 525 km | 425 km |
| Range (GCC) | 410 km | 366 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 77 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 73 kWh | 67 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 5.62 km/kWh | 5.46 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 7.1 | 6.3 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 160 kW, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) maxes out at 150 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 160 kW | 150 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 6.5 | 6.2 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | 1 motor: PMSM | 1 motor: PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 157 kW | 170 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 211 hp | 228 hp |
| Motor Torque | 343 Nm | 330 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7 s | 7.4 s |
| Top Speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Dimensions
The Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) is longer, but has a similar width and height to the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022).
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4540 mm | 4425 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 1895 mm | 2034 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1890 mm | 1873 mm |
| Height | 1641 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2739 mm | 2702 mm |
Cargo and Towing
The Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022), but the Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
The Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric (2022) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD (2024-…).
| Property | Peugeot e-3008 73 kWh FWD | Volvo XC40 Recharge (EX40) Pure Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2083 kg | 2030 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 520 l | 410 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 1480 l | 1295 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 31 l |
| Towing Capacity | 1250 kg | 1500 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.7 | 6.8 |
