Global EV Comparison: Rimac Nevera C_Two vs Audi Q4 e-tron 40
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is currently produced, it is not offered for sale in Europe. The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) has been discontinued. You can find it for as low as €28278 on the used car market.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is a Roadster, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is a SUV.
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2022-… | 2021-2024 |
| Current Status | Produced | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | Croatia | Germany, China |
| Body Style | Roadster | SUV |
| Market Availability | USA | EU, USA |
| Price Europe (Used) | - Price Europe (Used) | €28278 |
| GCC Score | 6.9 | 6.2 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024).
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 491 km | 426 km |
| Range (WLTP) | 490 km | 523 km |
| Range (GCC) | 441 km | 417 km |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 120 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 114 kWh | 76.6 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 km | 25.9 kWh/100 km | 18.4 kWh/100 km |
| Efficiency per kWh | 3.87 km/kWh | 5.44 km/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 4.9 | 6.9 |
Charging
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features an advanced 730-volt architecture, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 500 kW, while the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) maxes out at 143 kW.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is limited to 11 kW.
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 22 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 500 kW | 143 kW |
| Architecture | 730 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 10 | 6.4 |
Performance
The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Nevera (2022-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 100 km/h.
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | RWD |
| Motor Type | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 1427 kW | 150 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 1914 hp | 201 hp |
| Motor Torque | 2340 Nm | 310 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 1.8 s | 8.5 s |
| Top Speed | 412 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Performance Score | 8.9 | 3.3 |
Dimensions
Both models have similar wheelbase lengths.
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4745 mm | 4588 mm |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 2052 mm | 2108 mm |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | - Width (w/o Mirrors) | 1865 mm |
| Height | 1240 mm | 1632 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2745 mm | 2764 mm |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Audi Q4 e-tron 40 (2021-2024) has a towing capacity of up to 1000 kg, whereas the Rimac Nevera (2022-…) is not officially rated for towing in the EU.
| Property | Rimac Nevera C_Two | Audi Q4 e-tron 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 2300 kg | 2125 kg |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 100 l | 520 l |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | - Cargo Volume (Max) | 1490 l |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | 1000 kg |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 3.3 | 6.7 |
