Tesla Roadster 2.0 vs Rimac Concept One Gen 1
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Since both vehicles have been discontinued, they are now only available on the used car market. You can get the Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) for as low as $85000, while the Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) was never offered for sale in the United States.
The Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) is a Roadster, whereas the Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) is a Coupe.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2009-2010 | 2013-2016 |
| Current Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Country of Manufacture | USA | Croatia |
| Body Style | Roadster | Coupe |
| Market Availability | USA | EU |
| Price USA (Used) | $85000 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 5.4 | 5.8 |
Range and Efficiency
Even though the Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) has a larger battery, the Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) higher energy efficiency results in a longer real-world driving range.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 244 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | - Range (WLTP) | 217 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 232 mi | 185 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 53 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 50.4 kWh | 78 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 21.7 kWh/100 mi | 42.2 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.6 mi/kWh | 2.37 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 8 | 3.2 |
Charging
The Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) has no DC fast charging capability, whereas the Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) can charge at up to 120 kW.
The Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) is limited to 16.8 kW.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 16.8 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | - Max Charging Power (DC) | 120 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 650 V |
| Charge Port | Type 1 (J1772) | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 5.8 | 8.1 |
Performance
The Tesla Roadster 2.0 (2009-2010) is rear-wheel drive, while the Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) offers an all-wheel drive system.
The Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | RWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | IM | 2 PMSM (front), 2 PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 215 kW | 913 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 288 hp | 1224 hp |
| Motor Torque | 280 lb-ft | 1180 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9 s | 2.4 s |
| Top Speed | 125 mph | 211 mph |
| Performance Score | 5 | 8.6 |
Dimensions
The Rimac Concept One (2013-2016) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 155.4 in | 164.8 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 73.7 in | 73 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 72.9 in | - Width (w/o Mirrors) |
| Height | 44.4 in | 42.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 92.6 in | 100.9 in |
Cargo and Towing
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Tesla Roadster 2.0 | Rimac Concept One Gen 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Curb Weight | 2727 lb | 4078 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 5.3 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Trunk) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 2.3 | 2.5 |
