USA EV Comparison: Mini Aceman E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
While both vehicles are currently in production, they are not sold in the United States.
The two vehicles share the same body style: SUV.
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2025-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | China | India |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Market Availability | EU | EU |
| GCC Score | 5.7 | 5.9 |
Range and Efficiency
While the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) offers a longer real-world range and a bigger battery, it is less energy-efficient than the Mini Aceman E (2024-…).
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Range (WLTP) | 193 mi | 265 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 165 mi | 225 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 42.5 kWh | 61.1 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 38.5 kWh | 59.8 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 23.3 kWh/100 mi | 26.6 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 4.29 mi/kWh | 3.76 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.3 | 6.7 |
Charging
Both vehicles utilize a standard 400-volt architecture.
The Mini Aceman E (2024-…) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 70 kW, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) maxes out at 55 kW.
Both vehicles are equipped with the same on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 11 kW.
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 70 kW | 55 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 400 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 2 | CCS Type 2 |
| Charging Score | 5.2 | 5.6 |
Performance
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive.
The Mini Aceman E (2024-…) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | FWD | FWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM | PMSM |
| Motor Power (kW) | 135 kW | 128 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 181 hp | 172 hp |
| Motor Torque | 214 lb-ft | 142 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
| Top Speed | 99 mph | 85 mph |
| Performance Score | 3.4 | 2.9 |
Dimensions
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is longer, wider, and taller.
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 160.6 in | 168.7 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 78.4 in | 81.3 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 69.1 in | 70.9 in |
| Height | 59.6 in | 64.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 102.6 in | 106.3 in |
Cargo and Towing
The Mini Aceman E (2024-…) provides more cargo capacity, featuring both a larger trunk and more space with the rear seats folded.
Neither car is equipped with a frunk (front trunk).
The Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD (2025-…) is better suited for heavy loads, offering a greater towing capacity than the Mini Aceman E (2024-…).
| Property | Mini Aceman E | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61.1 kWh FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 3792 lb | 4045 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 10.6 ft3 | 8.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 35.5 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) |
| Towing Capacity | 1653 lb | 1654 lb |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 5.3 | 6.2 |
