USA EV Comparison: Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ vs Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon)
Struggling to Decide? Let AI Help!
Your AI Summary Is Ready!
General Info
Both vehicles are currently in production and can be purchased new. The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) has a starting price of $147550, compared to the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), which starts at $120000.
The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) is a Sedan, whereas the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) is a Liftback.
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Years of Production | 2024-… | 2024-… |
| Current Status | Produced | Produced |
| Country of Manufacture | Germany, India | China |
| Body Style | Sedan | Liftback |
| Market Availability | EU, USA | EU, USA |
| Price USA (New) | $147550 | $120000 |
| Price USA (Used) | $90295 | - Price USA (Used) |
| GCC Score | 7.1 | 6.9 |
Range and Efficiency
The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) boasts a greater real-world range, a larger battery, and superior energy efficiency compared to the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...).
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Range (EPA) | 315 mi | - Range (EPA) |
| Range (WLTP) | 389 mi | 301 mi |
| Range (GCC) | 309 mi | 250 mi |
| Battery Capacity (Nominal) | 125 kWh | 102 kWh |
| Battery Capacity (Usable) | 118 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Efficiency per 100 mi | 38.2 kWh/100 mi | 40 kWh/100 mi |
| Efficiency per kWh | 2.62 mi/kWh | 2.5 mi/kWh |
| Range and Efficiency Score | 6.2 | 4.6 |
Charging
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features an advanced 800-volt architecture, whereas the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) relies on a standard 400-volt system.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) offers faster charging speeds at DC stations, reaching up to 350 kW, while the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) maxes out at 200 kW.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) features a more powerful on-board charger, supporting a maximum AC charging power of 22 kW, whereas the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) is limited to 19.2 kW.
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Max Charging Power (AC) | 19.2 kW | 22 kW |
| Max Charging Power (DC) | 200 kW | 350 kW |
| Architecture | 400 V | 800 V |
| Charge Port | CCS Type 1 | CCS Type 1 |
| Charging Score | 8.6 | 9.9 |
Performance
Both vehicles are all-wheel drive.
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) boasts greater motor power and accelerates faster from 0 to 60 mph.
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Motor Type | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) | PMSM (front), PMSM (rear) |
| Motor Power (kW) | 560 kW | 675 kW |
| Motor Power (hp) | 751 hp | 905 hp |
| Motor Torque | 752 lb-ft | 726 lb-ft |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3 s | 2.7 s |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 159 mph |
| Performance Score | 7.7 | 7.9 |
Dimensions
The Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...) has a wider body, offering a more shoulder room, while the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) stands taller for a more elevated driving position. Despite these differences, their lengths are nearly identical.
The Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) boasts a more extended wheelbase.
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 205.6 in | 202.3 in |
| Width (with Mirrors) | 83.7 in | 88.2 in |
| Width (w/o Mirrors) | 75.8 in | 78.9 in |
| Height | 59.8 in | 57.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 126.4 in | 120.8 in |
Cargo and Towing
A frunk (front trunk) is available in the Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) (2024-...), but the Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ (2024-…) doesn’t have one.
Neither vehicle is officially rated for towing in the US.
| Property | Mercedes EQS AMG 53 4MATIC+ | Lotus Emeya R (900 Sport/Sport Carbon) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Curb Weight | 5864 lb | 5842 lb |
| Cargo Volume (Trunk) | 21.9 ft3 | 18 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume (Max) | 60 ft3 | - Cargo Volume (Max) |
| Cargo Volume (Frunk) | - Cargo Volume (Frunk) | 1.6 ft3 |
| Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity | - Towing Capacity |
| Cargo and Towing Score | 6.4 | 5.5 |